ASOS H1 results show a 51% jump in AEBITDA despite falling sales, as its turnaround plan to rebuild on healthier economics begins to bear fruit.
This article covers information on ASOS PLC.
LON:ASCThese ASOS interim results are better than the topline decline might make them look. Sales are still going backwards, yes, but the quality of the business is improving – margins are up, profit per order is up, and management says trading in Q3 is improving again.
For retail investors, the key point is simple. ASOS is no longer trying to buy growth at any cost. It is trying to rebuild the business on healthier economics first, then return to growth. This update suggests that plan is starting to work, although it is not job done.
| Metric | H1 FY26 | H1 FY25 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| GMV | £1,170.1 million | £1,277.4 million | (9%) |
| Adjusted revenue | £1,113.5 million | £1,291.6 million | (14%) |
| Adjusted gross margin | 48.5% | 45.2% | +330bps |
| Adjusted EBITDA | £64.0 million | £42.5 million | +51% |
| Adjusted EBIT | (£18.3 million) | (£39.6 million) | £21.3 million improvement |
| Adjusted loss before tax | (£52.4 million) | (£69.5 million) | £17.1 million improvement |
| Free cash outflow | (£92.6 million) | (£84.1 million) | (£8.5 million) |
| Net debt | (£294.9 million) | (£275.8 million) | (£19.1 million) |
ASOS also reported a statutory loss before tax of £137.9 million, improved from £241.5 million. That statutory figure includes large one-off or non-cash items, most notably a £67.3 million impairment of legacy technology assets after deciding to move its ERP system onto Microsoft Dynamics.
The big win here is margin. Adjusted gross margin improved by 330 basis points to 48.5%, which is a chunky move for a retailer. A basis point is one hundredth of a percentage point, so 330bps means 3.3 percentage points.
That margin improvement came from better buying, more full-price sales, tighter stock control and the growing use of flexible fulfilment. In plain English, ASOS is doing a better job of selling what customers want without leaning so hard on discounts.
Flexible fulfilment matters more than it sounds. This is where partner brands fulfil more of the stock or ASOS earns commission without always owning the inventory itself. That tends to reduce reported revenue, because ASOS books commission rather than the full selling price, but it can improve margins and lower stock risk.
Related
Polar Capital Technology Trust sees 102% NAV growth in FY2026, beating its benchmark by 47 points thanks to AI and semiconductor exposure.
JoshuaJuly 10, 2026
Last updated
Category
InvestingViews
22 viewsLikes
No ratings yet
That is exactly what happened here. GMV, or gross merchandise value, fell 9%, while adjusted revenue fell 14%. Revenue looked worse than underlying demand partly because of this business model shift, not just because customers bought less.
There was solid operational progress too. Supply chain cost to serve fell by 150bps year-on-year, helped by warehouse optimisation and renegotiated logistics contracts. Berlin fulfilment automation is expected to deliver around a 10% cost saving, equal to about £2.5 million per annum.
Returns are another area where ASOS has clearly got more disciplined. The new returns policy and transparency tool helped improve the underlying returns rate by 160bps in H1. That matters because returns are expensive in online fashion, eating into margin and creating extra handling costs.
Management says profit per order rose by 30% year-on-year. That is a very useful sign because it shows the business is extracting more value from each purchase rather than relying on volume alone.
The weak spot is still topline growth. GMV fell 9%, active customers dropped to 16.5 million from 18.2 million, total shipped orders fell 11% to 26.3 million, and conversion slipped to 2.8% from 3.0%.
Even so, the direction of travel looks better. The UK, ASOS’s biggest market, outperformed the group with GMV down 5%. Womenswear, which is almost three-quarters of group GMV, delivered around a 10 percentage point improvement in growth versus H2 FY25.
New customer growth is the more encouraging read-through. In March, new customers were up 9% for the group, the first month of growth since September 2021. In the UK, new customers were up around 10% year-on-year, while churn, meaning customer losses, improved by 150bps in H1.
That does not guarantee a sales recovery, but it is the sort of lead indicator you want to see before the revenue line turns positive. ASOS is basically saying the customer engine is starting to restart.
This is where investors should keep their feet on the ground. Free cash outflow was £92.6 million, slightly worse than last year, and net debt excluding leases rose to £294.9 million. Cash and cash equivalents were £209.5 million at the period end.
Some of that pressure came from higher interest costs. Interest paid jumped to £29.7 million from £9.6 million, partly because there was no equivalent convertible bond coupon in H1 FY25.
After the period end, ASOS repaid the 2026 convertible bonds in full for £73.6 million in cash. The refinancing itself looks sensible enough: the group now has a £150.0 million senior term loan and an £87.5 million delayed draw term loan facility, which was undrawn at the period end, both maturing in November 2030.
The good news is that this gives more liquidity headroom and should reduce annual cash interest costs by around £5 million on a like-for-like basis. The less good news is that ASOS is still carrying a lot of debt for a business that remains loss-making at the EBIT level and reported total equity of only £85.2 million.
Management kept full-year guidance unchanged, and that is important. It now expects:
Holding guidance after a volatile half, which included about £7 million of IEEPA tariff costs in the US, is a decent sign of confidence. ASOS has also started the process to pursue refund claims related to those tariffs, but any outcome and timing are not disclosed.
There are still risks. US tariffs hurt profitability, the Middle East conflict is creating supply chain inflation and disruption, and demand recovery is not yet fully proven. But current trading being described as in line with expectations, with Q3 GMV trends improving again, is clearly better than the market would have feared a year ago.
I think this is a credible and mostly positive update. The headline sales declines are still ugly, but underneath them ASOS is building a more profitable retail model. Better gross margin, lower returns, leaner warehousing and improving new customer numbers are exactly the ingredients you want in a turnaround.
The bear case has not disappeared. Debt is still heavy, cash generation still needs to improve, and management has more to prove on getting back to sustainable growth. But the bull case is now easier to make because this no longer looks like a business stuck in a spiral of falling sales and collapsing economics.
My read is that ASOS is moving from rescue mode into rebuild mode. That does not make it low risk, but it does make these H1 FY26 results matter.
Impax Q3 AUM rises to £23.3bn despite £1.7bn net outflows, driven by market gains and strong investment performance.
JoshuaJuly 10, 2026
MJ Gleeson FY2026 trading update: steady profits, mixed home sales with operational restructuring improving outlook.
JoshuaJuly 10, 2026
No comments yet - start the conversation.