Chariot’s 2025 results are a strategic pivot to cashflow via Angola oil, but a going concern warning highlights the risk.
This article covers information on Chariot Limited.
LON:CHARChariot’s 2025 final results are really about one thing: the company is trying to reinvent itself around cash-generating upstream oil and gas, with the Angola transaction as the centrepiece. The renewables arm is still progressing nicely, but management is now openly looking to turn that progress into cash through a sale or divestment and use the money to push harder into upstream growth.
That makes this a strategically important update rather than a simple set of annual numbers. The headline profit looks better, but the real question for investors is whether Chariot can turn its Angola deal into actual cashflow and do it before balance sheet pressure bites.
The biggest development came after the year end. Chariot has secured economic exposure to oil production offshore Angola through Etu Energias’ acquisition of interests in Blocks 14 and 14K, subject to regulatory approvals.
These assets are currently producing circa 40,000 barrels of oil per day on a gross basis, and Chariot says it will be entitled to the economics associated with current production of 4,000 barrels of oil per day. That matters because Chariot has spent years as a story stock. This deal is meant to turn it into a cashflow stock.
Management says the base case indicative net NPV10 – net present value discounted at 10% – is in excess of US$100 million at a US$60/bbl oil price. For a company of Chariot’s size, that is a chunky number and explains why the market will probably judge almost everything else through the lens of Angola from here.
There is also a useful twist in the structure. The acquisition has an economic effective date of 1 January 2025, and Chariot says cashflow generated during the interim period should reduce the final consideration needed at completion. In plain English, the asset should partly pay for itself before the deal even formally closes. That is attractive.
Related
Polar Capital Technology Trust sees 102% NAV growth in FY2026, beating its benchmark by 47 points thanks to AI and semiconductor exposure.
JoshuaJuly 10, 2026
Last updated
Category
InvestingViews
19 viewsLikes
No ratings yet
Enjoying this?
Occasional emails on automation, AI and finance. Unsubscribe any time.
The catch is obvious enough: completion is expected in H2 2026 and still needs regulatory approvals. Until that happens, this is promising rather than proven.
Chariot reported a profit after tax of US$0.3 million for 2025, compared with a loss of US$22.3 million in 2024. On the surface, that looks like a dramatic turnaround.
But investors should not kid themselves that this was driven by underlying operating cash generation. A major reason for the improvement was a US$15.4 million gain on the deemed disposal of Chariot Generation and Trading (Pty) Limited, plus a US$14 million gain recognised through equity accounting linked to the Mahlako transaction.
Those are meaningful accounting gains, but they are not the same as a business gushing cash. The company still had very limited liquidity at the year end.
| Key number | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit/(loss) after tax | US$0.3 million | US$(22.3) million |
| Cash balance including restricted cash | US$1.2 million | US$2.9 million |
| Net liabilities excluding cash | US$2.6 million | US$3.0 million |
| Exploration and evaluation assets | US$52.5 million | US$56.5 million |
| Investments in associates and joint ventures | US$15.0 million | US$1.6 million |
There was some genuine cost discipline. Other administrative expenses fell to US$7.9 million from US$9.6 million, and share-based payments dropped to US$0.7 million from US$3.4 million. That is positive, especially for a company still pre-material revenues.
Here is the part that matters just as much as the Angola upside. The auditor’s report was not qualified, but it did include a material uncertainty relating to going concern.
The reason is simple. Chariot still has not earned material revenues to date and remains dependent on financing, asset partnering and successful deal execution. The board says that under a downside scenario where the Renewable Power business is not divested, there could potentially be a cash deficit from Q2 2027.
That does not mean collapse is around the corner. It does mean the investment case still depends on management delivering two things: completion of the Angola transaction and monetisation of renewables. If either slips badly, funding risk rises again.
Morocco remains important, even if it is no longer the market’s main focus. Chariot regained operatorship and a 75% working interest in the offshore Lixus and Rissana licences in May 2025.
The Anchois gas development has been rescaled around the resources already discovered in the Anchois-1 and Anchois-2 wells. The company says a turnkey EPCI proposal – engineering, procurement, construction and installation – shows that previously projected capex can be cut substantially while keeping production capacity at up to 105mmscfd.
That is encouraging because lower capex often makes marginal projects fundable. Chariot still quotes a gross NPV10 of US$0.65 billion to US$1 billion for the project, which is clearly substantial on paper.
Still, there is a but. Chariot is looking for partners across Lixus and Rissana, and discussions are underway with larger industry players and Moroccan investors. Until a partner signs, Morocco remains valuable optionality rather than near-term cashflow.
On the more negative side, the Loukos onshore licence saw a US$4.7 million impairment in 2025. That tells you management is getting more selective about where capital goes.
The renewables business actually had a good year. Etana Energy continues to scale in South Africa, with over 400MW of wind and solar under construction and more than 500MW of shovel-ready projects in the pipeline.
It also signed a 220MW 10-year power purchase agreement with Sibanye-Stillwater. That is the sort of commercial traction you want to see.
On top of that, Chariot has stakes in the 100MW Zen and 94MW Bergriver wind farms, both under construction. The business has secured major financing packages without parent-level dilution, which deserves credit.
So why sell? Because management now sees more strategic value in oil and gas. My read is that Chariot thinks the market will pay more attention to upstream cashflows than to a mixed energy model. That is probably fair, but selling a growing renewables platform too early can also mean leaving value on the table.
I think this update is broadly positive. Chariot finally has a route into meaningful production exposure, and the Angola deal looks like a genuine game changer if it completes on time. The economics look compelling, the partners are credible and the strategic direction is far clearer than it was a year ago.
But I would not call this low risk. The year-end cash position was thin, the profit was flattered by non-cash and accounting items, and the going concern warning is not something retail investors should shrug off.
So the bull case is straightforward: complete Angola, monetise renewables, and turn Chariot into a cash-generative African upstream company. The bear case is just as clear: delays, funding pressure and more dilution. This is now a classic execution story.
For shareholders, 2026 looks like the year Chariot either steps up a level or gets dragged back into financing mode again. That is why this set of final results matters.
Impax Q3 AUM rises to £23.3bn despite £1.7bn net outflows, driven by market gains and strong investment performance.
JoshuaJuly 10, 2026
MJ Gleeson FY2026 trading update: steady profits, mixed home sales with operational restructuring improving outlook.
JoshuaJuly 10, 2026
No comments yet - start the conversation.