eEnergy Group Reports 183% EBITDA Surge to £1.7m and Doubles Order Book in FY25
eEnergy's EBITDA surged 183% to £1.7m, its order book doubled to £14m, and it has raised its FY26 guidance. Read the full RNS analysis.
This article covers information on eEnergy Group PLC.
LON:EAASeEnergy’s FY25 trading update: EBITDA jumps, order book doubles, revenue shifts into FY26
eEnergy Group’s latest trading update is a tale of better margins and bigger contracts, but with some revenue sliding into next year. Adjusted EBITDA surged 183% to £1.7m despite revenue dipping to £23.0m. Management says £4.0m of revenue expected in FY25 has simply slipped into H1-26. The forward order book doubled to a record £14.0m, giving the Board confidence to lift FY26 guidance.
For context, Adjusted EBITDA is a profit proxy that excludes interest, tax, depreciation, amortisation, and adds back share-based payments. It’s useful for gauging underlying trading performance.
Key numbers at a glance
| Metric | FY25 | FY24 | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | £23.0m | £25.1m | £4.0m now expected to be recognised in H1-26 |
| Adjusted EBITDA | £1.7m | £0.6m | Up 183% on optimised cost base and efficiencies |
| Gross margin | 35.3% | 34.7% | Improved pricing, supplier terms, and delivery controls |
| Plc/non-operating costs | £2.0m | £2.5m | Lower central costs |
| Net debt (incl IFRS 16) | £1.6m | £2.4m | After drawing a £1.5m unsecured Harwood loan in Nov-25 |
| Cash | £0.9m | £2.3m | Expected to rise significantly in H1-26 as project cash flows arrive |
| Forward order book (for FY26) | £14.0m | £7.0m (start of FY25) | Up 100% year-on-year |
| Investment-grade pipeline | £127.0m | n/a | Opportunities over the next 36 months |
| Redaptive funding drawn | £13.0m | n/a | 175 solar/LED projects across 179 locations and 51 customers |
| H1-25 comparator revenue | £10.1m | n/a | H1-26 expected to be significantly ahead |
| FY26 guidance | Revenue £34.0m | Prior: £30.0m | Adjusted EBITDA £4.5m (prior: £4.0m) |
All FY25 figures are subject to audit.
What drove the profitability rebound?
Margins ticked up to 35.3% thanks to sharper quoting, better supplier terms and tighter project delivery. Central costs were trimmed to £2.0m. The pivot from a direct sales education focus to a multi-channel, framework-driven model looks to be paying off with more sizeable awards and improved operating leverage.
A big driver in H2 was the UK Government-backed solar PV and battery programme managed by Mace – eEnergy’s largest project to date – with £5.1m recognised in FY25. That contract expanded from 47 to 73 schools and widened to include LED and EV charging, underscoring the benefit of multi-technology capability.
Order book at £14.0m and pipeline at £127.0m – why it matters
The forward order book is work contracted or awarded but not yet delivered. At £14.0m, it is double the level at the start of FY25 and largely loaded into H1-26, which should lift first-half revenue above the £10.1m seen in H1-25. The £127.0m “investment-grade” pipeline – credible opportunities over the next 36 months – gives line of sight beyond the already-won work.
In short, visibility is improving. That’s why the Board has lifted FY26 guidance to £34.0m revenue and £4.5m Adjusted EBITDA. Delivery is now the name of the game.
Funding lines and working capital: short-term squeeze, H1-26 relief in sight
Cash at year-end was £0.9m and net debt (including IFRS 16 lease liabilities) was £1.6m. The company drew a £1.5m unsecured loan from Harwood in November 2025 to support rapid deployment on the Mace award. Facilities remain in place: up to £100m via Redaptive for off-balance sheet customer funding and a £40m NatWest facility for public sector contracts.
Why the low cash? A build-up in accrued revenue on recent awards – £6.4m across the Mace award (£5.2m), a UK golf course ground-mount solar project (£0.6m), NHS NEEF awards (£0.4m) and West Berkshire Council (£0.2m). Management expects this to unwind into cash from late January 2026. That should support the guidance for “substantial” cash generation in FY26, but execution and timing remain key watch-outs.
Strategic wins: NHS frameworks, LASER and local authority awards
Frameworks and tenders did the heavy lifting in FY25:
- NHS trusts awarded c£1.7m across LED, solar PV and batteries via NHS National Energy Efficiency Fund (NEEF).
- LASER Supply (Y24013) Framework – eEnergy secured a place on four Lots, covering solar installation, specialist systems (including carports, ground-mount, batteries, EV, smart grids), and PPAs/innovative funding.
- Local authority: a £0.7m solar PV contract at West Berkshire Council’s Integrated Waste Management site (c886 kWp).
- Commercial: a £2.0m ground-mount solar installation at a UK golf course.
These are precisely the channels – frameworks and partnerships – that support scale and repeatability. They also tend to have more complex sign-off processes, which may explain some of the revenue timing slippage.
New recurring and “as-a-Service” models: SolarLife and first-of-its-kind EPC
eEnergy launched SolarLife, a structured solar operations and maintenance service expected to deliver at least c£0.2m of recurring revenue from FY26. It is not included in the £14.0m order book, so it’s incremental. Recurring O&M is attractive because it smooths revenues through the year and deepens customer relationships.
The new Energy Performance Contract (EPC) model – backed by Redaptive – offers off-balance sheet funding with guaranteed customer savings and zero upfront cost. Management calls it a first of its kind in the UK, with the NHS a prime use case. The first EPC contract is with Symphony Healthcare Services for LED upgrades across 18 GP surgeries, totalling £0.7m. If this scales, it could be a meaningful growth driver given eEnergy’s footprint in education and healthcare.
Quick jargon check: an EPC is a contract where the provider guarantees a certain level of energy savings. O&M stands for operations and maintenance – the ongoing servicing of installed kit. IFRS 16 brings lease liabilities onto the balance sheet, which is why net debt is quoted “including IFRS 16”.
Balanced view: strengths and watch-outs
- Positives:
- Adjusted EBITDA up 183% to £1.7m with margin improvement to 35.3%.
- Order book doubled to £14.0m; pipeline built to £127.0m.
- Strong framework traction (NHS, LASER) and a flagship Mace programme with £5.1m recognised.
- Robust funding lines (up to £100m via Redaptive; £40m NatWest).
- FY26 guidance upgraded to £34.0m revenue and £4.5m Adjusted EBITDA.
- New recurring revenue through SolarLife; innovative EPC model landing first contract.
- Watch-outs:
- FY25 revenue fell to £23.0m and £4.0m is pushed into H1-26 – timing risk remains.
- Year-end cash of £0.9m and reliance on working capital unwinding in early 2026.
- Execution risk on larger, multi-party government contracts with complex approvals.
- Concentration risk from big programmes (e.g. Mace) and public sector timelines.
- All FY25 figures are unaudited at this stage.
My take for retail investors
This is a cleaner, more scalable eEnergy than a year ago. The company has tightened its cost base, nudged margins higher and proven it can win and deliver larger framework-led programmes. The doubled order book and upgraded FY26 guidance are the standout positives. The new EPC model could be a catalyst if the NHS and other public sector bodies adopt it at scale.
The flip side is cash. The working capital build explains the low year-end balance, but that now needs to convert to cash promptly in H1-26. Watch the cadence of receipts from Mace, NHS NEEF and West Berkshire, plus any new EPC signings. If cash generation arrives as guided, the investment case improves materially; if it stalls, the balance sheet could feel tight.
Key things to watch next:
- H1-26 revenue momentum relative to the £10.1m H1-25 comparator.
- Cash inflows from late January 2026 as accrued revenue unwinds.
- Additional EPC wins and scale-up across NHS and education estates.
- Further framework awards and conversion from the £127.0m pipeline.
- Gross margin trend and any updates on the Mace programme expansion.
Overall, a confident update: improved profitability, stronger visibility, and ambitious FY26 targets – with delivery and cash conversion the two levers that will decide how the story trades from here.
Related
Keep reading
Investing
African Pioneer’s Xinhai deal could fund Ongombo, but ownership is the price
Xinhai could fund African Pioneer’s Namibian copper development through to commissioning, but may receive 73.68% of the project holding company.
JoshuaJuly 30, 2026
Investing
Vanquis profit rises 44%, but lower margins push returns further out
Vanquis grew lending and profit in the first half, but weaker credit card yields and higher impairments led management to reduce returns guidance.
JoshuaJuly 30, 2026
Investing
ZOO Digital Final Results: Lower Revenue, Stronger Margins and a Return to Growth in Sight
ZOO Digital's FY26 revenue fell 14.7%, but restructuring lifted adjusted EBITDA to $4.0 million and helped the group generate cash.
JoshuaJuly 30, 2026
Last updated
Category
InvestingLikes
Star Rating
No ratings yet
Comments
No comments yet - start the conversation.