Discover HgCapital Trust's H1 2025 results: robust 19% revenue growth amid market headwinds, flat NAV, and a wider discount.
This article covers information on HgCapital Trust PLC.
LON:HGTHgCapital Trust (HgT) delivered robust trading from its unquoted software portfolio in H1 2025, but public market valuation moves and FX headwinds muted the reported numbers. Net assets were steady at £2.5 billion, with NAV per share of 539.5p, a total return of -0.4% for the six months to 30 June. The share price total return was -3.8% over the period.
Under the bonnet, it was a different story: the portfolio posted last‑twelve‑months (LTM) revenue growth of 19% and EBITDA growth of 18%, with an average EBITDA margin of 33%. That’s the engine room doing its job – it’s just that the market’s measuring stick moved against it.
| Metric | H1 2025 |
|---|---|
| NAV per share | 539.5p (total return -0.4%) |
| Share price | 515.0p at 30 June (total return -3.8%) |
| Net assets | £2.5 billion |
| Market capitalisation | £2.4 billion |
| LTM revenue growth | +19% |
| LTM EBITDA growth | +18% (margin 33%) |
| Portfolio valuation multiple | 25.7x EV/EBITDA |
| Net debt to EBITDA (portfolio) | 7.4x |
| Investments | £306 million |
| Gross realisations | £165 million |
| Available liquid resources | £432 million (incl. £375 million undrawn RCF at 30 June) |
| Outstanding commitments | £1.4 billion (expected to be drawn over 4‑5 years) |
| Interim dividend | 2.0p per share |
| Ongoing charges | 1.5% (annualised) |
Definitions: NAV per share is the net asset value per share after fees. EV/EBITDA is enterprise value divided by EBITDA – a common way to value cash‑generative software businesses. Net debt to EBITDA is a leverage measure; higher numbers imply more debt relative to earnings.
HgT’s companies continue to sell essential, “mission‑critical” software – the sticky, recurring revenue kind that tends to hold up through cycles. That explains the +19% sales and +18% EBITDA growth. However, Hg values its private holdings with reference to listed comparators. Those public multiples fell earlier in the year, offsetting earnings growth and keeping NAV flat. Management also flags adverse FX as a drag.
Hg revalues quarterly. Q1 2025 saw a -2.0% NAV move, followed by +1.6% in Q2 as earnings pushed through. Note that public software indices were extremely volatile – weak in Q1 and very strong in Q2 – and Hg’s methodology deliberately smooths the impact versus headline indices.
Opinion: realisations at a premium to carrying value are a clear positive for confidence in the book values. Continued bolt‑on M&A supports Hg’s playbook of compounding growth through consolidation.
Related
Polar Capital Technology Trust sees 102% NAV growth in FY2026, beating its benchmark by 47 points thanks to AI and semiconductor exposure.
JoshuaJuly 10, 2026
Last updated
Category
InvestingViews
73 viewsLikes
No ratings yet
Last updated:
At 30 June, HgT had £432 million of available liquid resources, including a £375 million revolving credit facility (RCF) that was undrawn. Outstanding commitments stood at £1.4 billion, expected to be drawn over the next 4‑5 years.
Post period to 31 August, available liquid resources were £353 million (14% of pro‑forma NAV), with £28 million drawn on the RCF. Outstanding commitments increased to £1.7 billion (70% of pro‑forma NAV) after new fund commitments to Hg Genesis 11 (€350 million) and Hg Mercury 5 (€150 million). Hg Saturn 4 saw a $1.0 billion commitment in Q1 2025, with drawings expected from 2026; Genesis 11 and Mercury 5 anticipate first capital calls in 2027. HgT retains an “opt‑out” right within investment agreements – a useful risk valve.
Opinion: the step‑up in commitments tightens the forward funding picture, but the draw schedule, subscription facilities, RCF headroom and opt‑out provide multiple levers to manage liquidity without diluting returns.
HgT emphasises long‑term NAV and share price growth over delivering a specific yield, but it has guided to a 5p per share dividend “floor” in recent years (not a commitment).
The portfolio’s average valuation multiple is 25.7x EV/EBITDA, with average net debt to EBITDA of 7.4x. Management notes that, given equity valuations, debt accounts for less than 30% of the average capital structure, offering an equity cushion and covenant flexibility.
The shares traded at a discount to NAV of roughly 4.5% at 30 June (515.0p vs 539.5p) and widened to about 7.2% by 31 August (502.0p vs 541.2p). HgT operates a share buyback framework with defined triggers; the Board weighs buybacks against alternative uses of capital for long‑term NAV growth.
On the RNS’s measure, £1,000 invested 20 years ago (with dividends reinvested) would now be worth £15,317 versus £3,808 for the FTSE All‑Share. Over 10 years, HgT’s share price total return has compounded at 19.2% per annum, outperforming the FTSE All‑Share by 12.4% per annum. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results, but it shows the power of the strategy when compounding is allowed to do its thing.
The full interim report and presentation are available at hgcapitaltrust.com.
Reminder: The value of shares and the income from them can go down as well as up due to market and currency movements, and investors may not get back the amount originally invested.
Impax Q3 AUM rises to £23.3bn despite £1.7bn net outflows, driven by market gains and strong investment performance.
JoshuaJuly 10, 2026
MJ Gleeson FY2026 trading update: steady profits, mixed home sales with operational restructuring improving outlook.
JoshuaJuly 10, 2026
No comments yet - start the conversation.