Santander UK Q1 profits fall 44% on motor finance provision, but underlying banking steady, costs down, TSB deal nears completion. Resilient quarter with one-off sting.
This article covers information on Santander UK Group Holdings PLC.
LON:SANBSantander UK has started 2026 with a slightly odd-looking set of numbers. The headline is weak: profit before tax fell 44% to £202 million from £358 million a year earlier. But the main culprit was not the everyday banking business – it was a big extra provision for historical motor finance commission payments.
That matters because it changes the tone of the update. On the surface, profits slumped. Underneath, lending grew, costs fell, deposits edged up and capital stayed strong. In plain English, the core bank looks fairly steady, even if regulation has taken a big bite out of this quarter.
| Metric | Q1-26 / 31 March 2026 | Comparator |
|---|---|---|
| Profit before tax | £202 million | £358 million in Q1-25 |
| Profit after tax | £146 million | £269 million in Q1-25 |
| Net interest income | £1,102 million | £1,120 million in Q1-25 |
| Banking NIM | 2.22% | 2.30% in Q1-25 |
| Operating expenses | £638 million | £685 million in Q1-25 |
| Customer loans | £202.1 billion | £200.6 billion at Dec-25 |
| Customer deposits | £190.5 billion | £190.2 billion at Dec-25 |
| CET1 ratio | 15.7% | 15.7% at Dec-25 |
| LCR | 162% | 166% at Dec-25 |
| Total motor finance provision | £633 million | Not disclosed for Q1-25 |
The big issue here is the FCA’s motor finance consumer redress scheme. Santander UK said that, after reviewing the final rules, it decided not to challenge the scheme and instead focus on implementing it. That sounds practical, but it came with a hefty cost.
The bank booked an additional charge of £179 million in Q1-26, taking the total provision to £633 million at 31 March 2026. A provision is money set aside now for a likely future cost. Santander said this total is at the upper end of the range it had previously assessed, but it also warned that the ultimate financial impact could still change depending on future legal or regulatory developments.
My take: this is the main negative in the update, and it is a serious one. The good news is that Santander is trying to draw a line under it rather than fight on indefinitely. The less good news is obvious – £633 million is real money, and the bank is still telling investors the final bill is not nailed down.
Once you get past the motor finance hit, the rest of the quarter reads much better. Net operating income was £1,153 million, essentially flat on the £1,150 million recorded in Q1-25. Non-interest income jumped 70% to £51 million, helped by stronger retail and corporate fee income.
Costs were the standout positive. Operating expenses fell 7% to £638 million from £685 million, driven by simplification and automation. Santander’s cost-to-income ratio, or CIR – a measure of efficiency – improved to 55% from 60%.
That is the bit I like most in this release. If a bank can keep revenue broadly steady while cutting costs, that usually gives it more resilience. Santander is clearly trying to show that its investment in technology, automation and AI is doing more than generating nice press lines.
There was still some pressure on margins. Banking net interest margin, or NIM – basically the spread between what the bank earns on lending and what it pays on funding – fell to 2.22% from 2.30% a year earlier because deposit costs rose. Even so, it was slightly up on Q4-25’s 2.21%, and management expects NIM to be stable in 2026.
Lending growth was decent. Customer loans increased to £202.1 billion from £200.6 billion at the end of 2025, with mortgage balances rising to £170.2 billion from £169.0 billion. Gross mortgage lending reached £6.4 billion in Q1-26, up from £5.8 billion a year earlier.
Deposits also nudged higher to £190.5 billion from £190.2 billion, with customers continuing to move money into term savings products. That is pretty normal in a higher-rate world, although it does mean banks often have to pay more to keep depositors happy.
Credit quality still looks fairly solid overall. Santander said asset quality remains good, with the Stage 3 ratio improving to 1.15% from 1.17% at Dec-25. Stage 3 loans are the problem loans, so lower is better.
There are some early signs of normalisation in bad debt charges. Credit impairment charges rose to £73 million from £52 million, and the cost of risk ticked up to 11 basis points from 10 basis points at Dec-25. Management said this is trending back towards pre-pandemic levels, so it is not a shock, but it is a reminder that credit costs are moving in the wrong direction from ultra-benign levels.
Santander continues to reshape its branch network. In Q1-26 it announced the closure of 44 branches, with community bankers, Santander Locals and banking hubs used to maintain face-to-face support. The refreshed network will consist of 305 branches and 111 Santander Locals.
From a shareholder and balance sheet perspective, this should help efficiency. From a customer perspective, branch closures are always a mixed bag. Santander is trying to soften that by investing in app features, chat, telephone banking and more Work Cafés, but some customers will still see this as a downgrade.
The other major theme is TSB. Santander said completion of the acquisition is expected imminently following recent regulatory approval. The agreed valuation is £2.65 billion, plus growth in tangible net assets up to completion, in an all-cash deal.
This is a big transaction. Santander says TSB brings about £34 billion of mortgages and about £35 billion in customer deposits. Combined, the two banks would serve nearly 28 million retail and business customers nationwide.
Strategically, this could be the real story here. Management is pitching TSB as a way to accelerate transformation, improve scale and unlock operational efficiencies through shared technology. That sounds credible enough, especially given Santander’s history of UK bank integrations, but integration risk is never zero. Big banking deals look smart on presentation slides; the hard part is making systems, staff and customers move across smoothly.
It is also worth noting that Santander UK has not yet set out its 2026-28 strategy and KPIs because those will come after TSB completes. So investors still do not have the full post-deal roadmap.
The balance sheet remains one of the more reassuring parts of this update. The CET1 ratio – a key measure of capital strength – stayed at 15.7%, while the UK leverage ratio was unchanged at 5.1%. Santander also had an LCR, or liquidity coverage ratio, of 162%, comfortably above regulatory requirements.
Funding looks sound too. The bank completed £6.1 billion of term issuance in Q1-26 and expects total issuance of £8.0 billion to £12.0 billion for 2026. Interestingly, the £650 million AT1 and £500 million T2 issued in the quarter were both fully subscribed by Banco Santander, which underlines support from the parent group.
The outlook, excluding any impact from TSB, is steady rather than exciting. Santander expects net lending growth to continue, NIM to be stable, costs to fall further through simplification and automation, and cost of risk to keep moving up towards pre-pandemic levels.
My bottom-line view is fairly simple. This was a weaker headline quarter, but not a weak operating quarter. The motor finance provision did the damage, and that issue is still the main thing to watch.
If you are looking at Santander UK’s underlying banking performance, there were enough positives here to stop this from being a gloomy update. Costs are improving, mortgage lending is growing, asset quality is holding up, and capital remains strong. Add in the imminent TSB completion, and Santander UK is clearly trying to set up a bigger and more efficient business.
The catch is that 2026 is not going to be a clean, simple year. Investors will have to weigh regulatory overhangs from motor finance against the potential upside from the TSB deal. Right now, I would call this a resilient quarter with a nasty one-off sting attached.
Related
Polar Capital Technology Trust sees 102% NAV growth in FY2026, beating its benchmark by 47 points thanks to AI and semiconductor exposure.
JoshuaJuly 10, 2026
Impax Q3 AUM rises to £23.3bn despite £1.7bn net outflows, driven by market gains and strong investment performance.
JoshuaJuly 10, 2026
MJ Gleeson FY2026 trading update: steady profits, mixed home sales with operational restructuring improving outlook.
JoshuaJuly 10, 2026
Last updated
Category
InvestingViews
36 viewsLikes
No ratings yet
No comments yet - start the conversation.