Naked Wines FY25 Results: Loss Narrows, Cash Flow Improves, Shareholder Distributions Commence
Naked Wines FY25: Loss narrows to £4.9m, cash flow surges £18.5m. Commences shareholder returns with £2m buyback as stabilisation phase progresses.
This article covers information on Naked Wines PLC.
LON:WINERight, let’s pop the cork on Naked Wines’ full-year results. After a turbulent few years, this feels less like a standard earnings report and more like a carefully orchestrated comeback tour. Under new CEO Rodrigo Maza and CFO Dominic Neary, the focus has shifted decisively: less frantic growth, more financial discipline. And the numbers? They’re telling a story of stabilisation, cash generation, and – crucially – the return of shareholder distributions. Let’s dive in.
Financial Performance: Losses Narrow, Cash Flows Improve
First, the headline act. Revenue landed at £250.2 million, down 14% year-on-year. That’s not pretty, but it’s exactly where management guided – and importantly, it’s an improvement on the 18% decline seen in FY24. The revenue drop stems from three main factors:
- The COVID hangover: Attrition from those massive FY21/FY22 customer cohorts (acquired during lockdowns) is finally easing.
- Strategic pullback: They deliberately cut inefficient marketing spend in Q3/Q4 FY25, sacrificing some volume.
- External pressures: No Easter trading in the UK financial year and broader economic headwinds played a role.
Profitability & Cash: The Real Wins
Where the narrative gets interesting is beneath the top line:
- Loss Before Tax: Sharply reduced to £4.9 million (from £16.3 million in FY24). This excludes a £9.9m impairment charge from the prior year, but still shows progress.
- Cash is King (and Queen): Net cash (excluding leases) surged to £30.1 million (up £10.5m YoY). Free cash flow was the star – £18.5 million generated, nearly triple the £6.7m in FY24. This was overwhelmingly driven by slashing inventory.
- Adjusted EBITDA (ex-inventory costs): £6.7 million, down from £8.7m but in line with guidance. Gross margin held relatively steady at 18.4%.
The standout achievement? Inventory reduction. Total stock (including winemaker advances) plunged by £37 million to £108 million. This wasn’t painless – it cost £6.5 million in liquidation charges – but it’s fundamental to unlocking cash and right-sizing the business.
Operational Reset: Leadership, Retention & The Core
Beyond the numbers, Naked’s rebuilding its foundations:
- New Leadership, New Culture: Maza and Neary have rebuilt the exec team, embedding a “data-led, high-performance culture.” Transparency and discipline are the new mantras.
- Member Retention Holds Firm: 75% retention rate (unchanged YoY). Crucially, profitable core members (those with >24 months tenure) generated over £40 million in repeat contribution – the engine room of the business.
- Customer Love is High: Net Promoter Score (NPS) jumped to 76 (“excellent”), up from 73. Customers who stick around really like the offering.
- Acquisition Cost Creep: Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC) edged up slightly to £74 (from £73). Reducing this is a stated priority under the new marketing strategy.
Maza’s emphasis on “testing, learning, and doubling down on what works” signals a pragmatic, less scattergun approach. Australia even returned to membership growth – a small but symbolic win.
The Sweet Sound of Returns: Shareholder Distributions Begin
This is the bit that’ll have investors perking up. After hoarding cash through the turnaround, Naked is finally ready to share:
- Policy Unveiled: Targeting ongoing distributions of up to 40% of 12-month cash creation or adjusted EBITDA (ex-inventory costs), whichever is lower.
- Immediate Action: A proposed £2 million share buyback kicks off shortly after these results.
- Medium-Term Promise: “More significant ad hoc distributions” are flagged as cash generation and sustainable profitability build under their plan.
This isn’t just a token gesture. It’s a declaration of confidence in the improved cash flow trajectory and a commitment to capital discipline. The £20 million net cash generated since the start of FY24 provides the firepower.
FY26 Guidance & The Road Ahead
Management isn’t shouting “mission accomplished” just yet. FY26 guidance is cautious, reflecting currency headwinds (a weaker USD hits GBP revenue/EBITDA) and the ongoing inventory liquidation:
- Revenue: £200m – £216m (FX impacted, down ~£7m)
- Adjusted EBITDA (ex-inventory costs): £5.5m – £7.5m (FX impacted, down ~£1.2m)
- Net Cash (ex leases): £35m – £39m (includes the £2m buyback)
- Cost Savings: £15m of the £23m medium-term target already actioned in Q1 FY26.
The focus remains squarely on the three pillars of the March 2025 strategy: releasing working capital (£40m more targeted from inventory), recalibrating around the profitable core (targeting £9-14m EBITDA), and returning to sustainable growth (5-10% top-line).
Final Thoughts: Stability First, Then Growth
Naked Wines’ FY25 results won’t win awards for top-line growth. But that’s not the game right now. This is a story of successful stabilisation:
- Cash flow has transformed from a worry to a strength.
- Inventory – the millstone – is being decisively cut away.
- Leadership is settled and preaching financial discipline.
- The loyal, profitable customer base remains highly engaged.
- Shareholders are finally getting paid.
CEO Rodrigo Maza’s closing remark – “FY26 will be an exciting year” – feels earned, not just optimistic. The heavy lifting of the turnaround appears done. The challenge now? Translating this hard-won stability into that promised sustainable, profitable growth. One thing’s certain: after years of volatility, investors sipping that first £2m buyback might just detect hints of a more palatable vintage ahead.
Related
Keep reading
Investing
African Pioneer’s Xinhai deal could fund Ongombo, but ownership is the price
Xinhai could fund African Pioneer’s Namibian copper development through to commissioning, but may receive 73.68% of the project holding company.
JoshuaJuly 30, 2026
Investing
Vanquis profit rises 44%, but lower margins push returns further out
Vanquis grew lending and profit in the first half, but weaker credit card yields and higher impairments led management to reduce returns guidance.
JoshuaJuly 30, 2026
Investing
ZOO Digital Final Results: Lower Revenue, Stronger Margins and a Return to Growth in Sight
ZOO Digital's FY26 revenue fell 14.7%, but restructuring lifted adjusted EBITDA to $4.0 million and helped the group generate cash.
JoshuaJuly 30, 2026
Last updated
Category
InvestingLikes
Star Rating
No ratings yet
Comments
No comments yet - start the conversation.